Quick Transition to One Day Length of Stay after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using a Digital Follow-Up Tool during COVID-19: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for efficient use of hospital infrastructure. The hypothesis was that a rapid shift to outpatient surgery after hip or knee arthroplasty could be implemented without compromising quality of care. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, pain management and patient-reported outcomes before and after the implementation of an accelerated discharge program using a digital follow-up tool. A retrospective cohort design was used to compare 97 patients who received primary total hip or knee arthroplasty during the pandemic (early discharge) to comparable 194 pre-pandemic patients (normal discharge). Both cohorts had the same inclusion criteria and were closely monitored using the digital follow-up tool. The accelerated discharge program reduced length of stay from a median of 3 days (before the pandemic) to a median of 1 day (during the pandemic) (p < 0.001). The complication rate of 2% was the same for both groups (p > 0.05). Patient-reported outcomes for matched samples of hip (n = 100) and knee (n = 82) arthroplasty patients were similar before, at 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery for both groups (p > 0.05). There were no differences in pain and medication consumption for the first 6 weeks (p > 0.05). This study demonstrates that reducing length of stay from three to one night after total knee or hip arthroplasty, with the help of a digital follow-up tool, results in a stable rate of complications, readmission, and comparable clinical outcomes, while reducing the socio-economic burden on the health system.

Digital Rehabilitation after Knee Arthroplasty: A Multi-Center Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Rehabilitation for total knee replacement (TKA) often involves in-person therapy sessions, which can be time consuming and costly. Digital rehabilitation has the potential to address these limitations, but most of these systems offer standardized protocols without considering the patient's pain, participation, and speed of recovery. Furthermore, most digital systems lack human support in case of need. The aim of this study was to investigate the engagement, safety, and clinical effectiveness of a personalized and adaptative app-based human-supported digital monitoring and rehabilitation program. In this prospective multi-center longitudinal cohort study, 127 patients were included. Undesired events were managed through a smart alert system. Doctors were triggered when there was a suspicion of problems. The drop-out rate, complications and readmissions, PROMS, and satisfaction were collected through the app. There was only 2% readmission. Doctor actions through the platform potentially avoided 57 consultations (85% of alerts). The adherence to the program was 77%, and 89% of the patients would recommend the use of the program. Personalized human-backed-up digital solutions can help to improve the rehabilitation journey of patients after TKA, lower healthcare-related costs by lowering the complication and readmission rate, and improve patient reported outcomes.

An anatomo-functional implant positioning technique with robotic assistance for primary TKA allows the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern, with a faster recovery at 6 months compared to an adjusted mechanical technique.

PURPOSE: An anatomo-functional implant positioning (AFIP) technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could restore physiological ligament balance (symmetric gap in extension, asymmetric gap in flexion). The purposes were to compare (1) ligament balancing in extension and flexion after TKA in the AFIP group, (2) TKA alignment, implant positioning and patellar tracking between AFIP and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) techniques, (3) clinical outcomes between both groups at 12 months. METHODS: All robotic-assisted TKA with an AFIP technique were included (n = 40). Exclusion criteria were genu valgum (HKA angle > 183°), extra-articular deformity more than 10°, and patellar maltracking (high-grade J-sign). One control patient with a TKA implanted by an aMA technique was matched for each case, based on age, body mass index, sex, and knee alignment. Ligament balancing (medial and lateral gaps in millimeters) in full extension and at 90° of flexion after TKA in the AFIP group was assessed with the robotic system. TKA alignment (HKA angle), implants positioning (femoral and tibial coronal axis, tibial slope, joint-line orientation), patellar tracking (patellar tilt and translation) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at 6 and 12 months were compared between both groups. The ligament balancing was compared using a t test for paired samples in the AFIP group. The radiographic measurements and KSS scores were compared between groups using a t test for independent samples. RESULTS: In the AFIP group, there was no significant difference between the medial and lateral gap laxity in extension (NS). A significant opening of the lateral gap was observed in flexion compared to extension (mean: + 2.9 mm; p < 0.0001). The mean postoperative HKA angle was comparable between both groups (177.3° ± 2.1 in the AFIP group vs 176.8° ± 3.2; NS). In the AFIP group, the femoral anatomy was restored (90.9° ± 1.6) and the tibial varus was partially corrected (87.4° ± 1.8). The improvement of Knee and Function KSS at 6 months was better in the AFIP group (59.3 ± 11.9 and 51.7 ± 20, respectively, versus 49.3 ± 9.7 and 20.8 ± 13; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The AFIP concept allowed the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern. With a more physiological target for ligament balancing, the AFIP technique had equivalent clinical outcomes at 12 months compared to aMA, with a faster recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III retrospective therapeutic case control series.

A prospective randomized controlled clinical investigation comparing two post-operative wound dressings used after elective hip and knee replacement; Mepilex® Border Post-Op versus Aquacel® surgical.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative wound complications, including blistering and surgical site infections, can increase recovery times, costs associated with hospital stay and morbidity. AIM: To compare two post-operative wound dressings (Mepilex Border Post-Op and Aquacel Surgical), in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: International, open-label, prospective, superiority, multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, controlled trial. Primary outcome was dressing failure, a composite endpoint assessing four factors weighted from highest to lowest in relation to the risk of surgical site infection. RESULTS: Mepilex Border Post-Op was comparable or superior to Aquacel® Surgical in all parameters investigated. Dressing failure rates, skin redness, itching under the dressing, pain during dressing removal and number of patients requiring a dressing change were low in both groups. Mepilex® Border Post-Op outperformed Aquacel Surgical for ease of application (p<0.0001) and removal (p<0.0001), ability to handle blood (p<0.0001), prevention of dressing residuals (p=0.0167), patient satisfaction of wearing the dressing during rehabilitation training (p=0.0037) and patients' overall experience with the dressing (P=0.0025). CONCLUSION: Both dressings performed well in terms of minimizing post-operative wound complications. However, in relation to clinician satisfaction, minimization of pain and facilitation of patient comfort, Mepilex® Border Post-Op outperformed Aquacel Surgical.

A neuro-anatomically grounded scheme for LIA gives superior analgesia and comfort levels compared to epidural analgesia until seven days after total knee arthroplasty.

LIA is an emerging alternative for patient-con- trolled epidural analgesia(PCEA) after total knee arthroplasty(TKA). LIA allows faster mobilisation, eliminates the risks of epidural catheters, and can hasten patient turnover. Conversely, PCEA provides reliable pain relief in the first days after this type of surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of antinociception, postoperative nausea & vomiting (PONV), and general comfort until 7 days postoperatively. 40 patients received PCEA and 41 received LIA. Patients were retrospectively asked for pain scores at the day of surgery(=D0), D2, and D7, PONV, and general comfort scores. Patients in the LIA group reported equal pain scores at D0, significantly better PONV scores and pain scores at D2 and D7. In addition to faster mobilisation and elimination of the risks and burden of an epidural catheter and PCEA, LIA delivers equal to better analgesia, and better PONV and general comfort scores.

Redefining Knee Balance in a Medially Stabilized Prosthesis: An In-Vitro Study.

BACKGROUND: To date, there is still no consensus on what soft tissues must be preserved and what structures can be safely released during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a medially stabilized implant. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of a progressive selective release of the medial and lateral soft tissues in a knee implanted with a medially stabilized prosthesis. METHOD: Six cadaveric fresh-frozen full leg specimens were tested. In each case, kinematic pattern and mediolateral laxity were measured in three stages: firstly, prior to implantation; secondly, after the implantation of the trial components, but before any soft tissue release; and thirdly, progressively as soft tissue was released with the trial implant in place. The incremental impact of each selective release on knee balance was then analyzed. RESULTS: In all cases sagittal stability was not affected by the progressive release of the lateral soft tissue envelope. It was possible to perform progressive lateral release provided the anterior one-third of the iliotibial band (ITB) remained intact. Progressive medial release could be performed on the medial side provided the anterior fibers of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) remained intact. CONCLUSION: The medially conforming implant remains stable provided the anterior fibers of sMCL and the anterior fibers of the ITB remain intact. The implant's sagittal stability is mainly dependent on its medial ball-in-socket design.

Patient satisfaction at 2 months following total knee replacement using a second generation medial-pivot system: follow-up of 250 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement (TKR) has been reported as high as 24%. Most previous studies have focused on satisfaction for TKR overall, with few reporting satisfaction for specific implant designs. The purpose of this study was to assess patient satisfaction for TKRs performed using a second generation medial-pivot system (EVOLUTION®, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., Arlington, TN, USA). METHODS: Of a single surgeon's first 250 consecutive TKRs performed using the subject system, 224 completed a patient satisfaction assessment, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion, and radiographs at 2 months follow-up. RESULTS: The overall very satisfied/satisfied rate was 94.6% at 2 months. Following the first 50 TKRs, the satisfied rate improved to 99.4% suggesting a bias towards the initial cases potentially due to learning the system and instrumentation. Overall KOOS, range of motion, and radiographic outcomes were satisfactory at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, more subjects implanted with a second generation medial-pivot system were satisfied compared to previous reports for TKR.

Patient-specific instruments: industry's innovation with a surgeon's interest.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was (1) to survey the orthopaedic companies about the volume of patient-specific instruments (PSI) used in Europe and worldwide; (2) to survey a group of knee arthroplasty surgeons on their acceptance of PSI and finally; (3) to survey a medico-legal expert on PSI-related issues. METHODS: Seven orthopaedic implant manufacturers were contacted to obtain their sales figures (in volume) of PSI in Europe and worldwide for the 2011 and 2012 period. During the Open Meeting of the Belgian Knee Society, a survey by a direct voting system was submitted to a selection of knee surgeons. Finally, a number of medico-legal 'PSI-related' questions were submitted to an adult reconstruction surgeon/legal expert. RESULTS: The total volume, for all contacted companies, of PSI in Europe for 2012 was 17,515 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 82,556 TKA worldwide. Biomet (Warsaw, USA) was the number one in volume, both in Europe as worldwide with their Signature system. Biomet represented 27 % of the market share in PSI worldwide. Stryker preferred not to reply to the survey because of the FDA class 1 recall on ShapeMatch cutting guides. Eighty per cent of the Belgian knee surgeons expressed a great interest in PSI and especially, for 58 % of them, if it would increase their surgical accuracy. They valued it even more in unicompartmental arthroplasty, and 55 % was ready to use single-use instruments. Surprisingly, 47 % of surgeons thought it was the company's responsibility if something goes wrong with a PSI-assisted case. The medico-legal expert concluded that PSI is a complex process that exposes surgeons to new risks in case of failure and stated that companies should not produce surgical guides without validation of the planning by the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific instruments is of great interest if it can proof to increase the surgical accuracy in knee arthroplasty to the level surgeons are expecting and if in the same time it would make the surgical process more efficient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.